Worth a read:
http://blogs.cisco.com/security/talos/cryptowall-3-0
My only question is why would the dropper care whether it's running in a virtual environment? A bit more digging reveals that the malware author is assuming that if his code ends up running in a VM, it's probably a sandbox and being studied, so the malicious code refuses to co-operate. Clever.
Here's the analysis of Cryptowall 2.0, from the same blog:
blogs.cisco.com/security/talos/cryptowall-2
Ban on Chinese tech so broad, US-made cars would be blocked, Polestar says
-
Polestar says its decision-makers are in Sweden, and the company is listed
on the NASDAQ.
2 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment